 |
Archive re: Suit originally filed April 14, 2009, against the Diocese and Corporation
and four subsequent suits filed in state (Hood County) and federal courts (indicated by **)
|
|
2021 |
|
Sept. 21: Texas Supreme Court dismisses TEC petition |
Sept. 9: Appellate court clears path for return of funds, property items to churches |
Aug. 28: Diocese, Corporation reach settlement with plaintiffs for legal costs |
Feb. 22: U.S. Supreme Court denies petition of TEC parties |
Press Release regarding the Court's decision |
|
2020 |
|
Dec. 23: Diocese, Corporation files combined Brief in Opposition to TEC petitions |
Oct. 19: TEC parties, All Saints’ petition U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Texas ruling |
May 22: Texas Supreme Court issues unanimous ruling in favor of the Diocese |
Bishop Reed’s Pastoral Letter to the Diocese: English • Spanish |
|
2019 |
|
Dec. 5: Supreme Court hears oral argument on appeal |
Aug. 30: Court sets date for oral argument |
Aug. 1: Filings complete in response to Court’s request |
June 7: Petitioners’ response filed |
April 10: Brief on the Merits filed |
Feb. 11: State Supreme Court has Petition ‘under consideration’ |
|
2018 |
|
Nov. 5: Diocese replies to TEC response |
Oct. 8: TEC parties file response, cross petition |
July 27: Diocese, Corporation file petition for review |
April 9: Court of Appeals issues opinion; Diocese and Corporation will appeal |
|
2017 |
|
Waiting for response from the Texas Second Court of Appeals |
|
2016 |
|
April 19: Oral argument in Second Court of Appeals |
March 4: Responses filed in Appellate Court |
|
2015 |
|
Dec. 4: TEC parties file briefs in appellate court |
Aug. 21: Five TEC congregations under supersedeas terms |
July 24: Trial court issues Final Judgment |
June 10: Court leaves All Saints’ property in Diocese |
June 1: Parties file replies; hearing rescheduled for June 10 |
May 27: Parties file responses to May 6 Motions
|
May 6: Parties file Motions concerning All Saints’ FW
|
March 11: TEC refuses to allow All Saints’ congregation to participate in Canon 32 process |
March 6: Canon 32 process initiated re: All Saints’, Fort Worth |
March 3: Statement from the Diocese |
March 2: Court denies TEC claims to Diocesan property |
Feb. 20: Trial Court ruling expected soon |
Jan. 23: Diocese files Reply to TEC parties’ Response |
|
2014 |
|
Dec. 22: Diocese files response to TEC Motion |
Dec. 1: Diocese, TEC parties file new Motions for Partial Summary Judgment |
Nov. 3: U.S. Supreme Court denies TEC petition |
Oct. 1: Discovery period closes |
Sept. 26: Diocese files Brief in Opposition with U.S. Supreme Court |
April 17: TEC suffers third loss in TX Supreme Court |
March 25: TEC plans desperate appeal to U.S. Supreme Court |
March 21: Supreme Court denies motion for rehearing |
|
2013 |
|
Dec. 6: Diocese files Response to Motion for Rehearing |
Sept. 20: Two federal Suits closed by court |
Sept 12: TEC parties to seek Supreme Court rehearing |
Sept. 10: Illinois court rules for Diocese of Quincy
The Anglican Curmudgeon explains |
Aug. 30: TX Supreme Court issues rulings • Bishop Iker’s Pastoral Letter to the Diocese
|
March 21: Letter to Court objects to “intimidation” of TEC bishops who signed
the April 24 amicus brief |
|
2012 |
|
Dec. 3: Oregon adopts neutral principles, supports authority of state trust law |
Nov. 15: Post-Submission Brief filed |
Oct. 16: Report on Oral Argument in the State Supreme Court |
Aug. 31: Supreme Court sets Oct. 16 for oral argument |
July 6: Motion filed for Expedited Oral Argument |
June 30: Bishop Iker responds to news of bishops accused of Title IV violations |
April 24: Seven TEC Bishops sign amicus brief |
March 23:Reply filed; hearing date anticipated |
Feb 28: Calendar changes in Supreme Court cases |
Feb. 27: Presbyterian laymen submit
amicus brief supporting our appeal |
Feb. 23: Diocese files brief supporting the appeal of Good Shepherd, San Angelo |
Feb. 6: Brief filed |
Jan. 6: The Texas State Supreme Court grants jurisdiction to hear our direct axppeal and set it for oral argument.
Read Bishop Iker’s message here. |
|
2011 |
|
Dec. 16: State Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in San Angelo case |
Oct. 20: Judge sets supersedeas bond |
Aug. 22: Update on the appeal |
July 1: Update |
June 2: Diocese asks Texas Supreme Court to hear appeal |
May 19: Judge asks parties to negotiate terms of bond |
May 18: Court hearing tomorrow |
May 13: Updates concerning three lawsuits |
April 28: Judge limits discovery, schedules May 19 date to set bond |
April 13: Notice of Appeal filed with State Supreme Court |
April 5: Judge grants severance and stay of main lawsuit |
April 1: First sections of plaintiffs’ 2,000-page filing |
March 31: Judge delays decision
|
March 30: Reply (to Local Episcopal Parties' motion) in Support of Motion |
March 25: Sever-and-stay hearing set for March 31 |
March 23: Report from the ACNA Chancellors meeting |
March 19: Analysis of TX appellate court ruling against San Angelo parish |
March 11: Statement Regarding Property Inspections |
Feb. 8: Revised order a first step toward appeal
|
Jan. 25: Diocese, Corporation ask trial court to stay orders during appeal process; hearing set |
Jan. 22: Diocese, Corporation announce intention to appeal trial court ruling
|
|
Jan. 14: Court holds Summary Judgment hearing in original case against Diocese, Corporation
|
Jan. 6: Federal judge stays all motions in the case ** |
|
2010 |
|
Dec. 23: Diocese, other defendants file Motion for Summary Judgment in Tarrant County |
Dec. 23: Federal court suit stayed by judge ** |
Nov. 26: TEC takes legal hit in California case
A report by George Conger |
Nov. 1: Bishop’s answer
to All Saints’ suit requests sanctions |
Oct. 18: A fourth lawsuit ** |
Sept. 30: Bishop Iker’s response to the third lawsuit ** |
Sept. 22: Schori-led group files more litigation ** |
Sept. 14: Tarrant County motion granted in part |
Sept. 2: Hood County case postponed ** |
Aug. 23: Sept. 2 hearing set in Hood County ** |
Aug. 19: Latest filings in lawsuits against the Diocese |
Aug. 5: Hood County court denies motions, sets hearing date** |
July 14: Hood County court hears arguments on summary judgment filings / PDF version ** |
July 9: Judge Chupp issues order granting Rule 12 Motion |
July 2: “Episcopal Church in Texas legal loss” An article from the Church of England Newspaper |
June 26: Statement from the Diocese (PDF) |
June 25: COURT OF APPEALS GRANTS PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Read the court’s opinion (PDF) |
June 2: Hood County court clears path for summary judgment hearing ** |
May 28: Prayer sought for June 2 hearing ** |
April 27: Appellate court hears arguments
Audio of the proceedings can be heard here |
April 22: Bishop Iker calls the Diocese to a day of fasting and prayer |
March 11: Appellate Court sets hearing date |
Feb. 18: Friend-of-the-Court filing supports Diocese (PDF)
Attorney Mark Brown of San Angelo explains why
Texas law supports the legal position of the Diocese and Corporation |
Feb. 8: Diocese files reply in support of Petition for Writ of Mandamus (48-pg PDF) |
Feb. 2: AAC Report summarizes TEC lawsuits, depositions, and canonical abuses |
Jan. 21: Plaintiffs’ attorneys respond to the appellate court
|
|
2009 |
Dec. 15: Court order grants request (PDF) |
Dec. 11: Parties request second extension of time to reply (PDF) |
Nov. 19: Parishes file Plea in Intervention |
Nov. 17: Appellate court issues stayin response to Mandamus filing (updated) |
Nov. 16: The appellate court’s order (PDF) |
Nov. 13: Petition for Writ of Mandamus (PDF) |
|
Oct. 2: ORDER granting continuance (PDF)
|
|
|
|
Sept. 25: Court will hear Motion for Reconsideration |
Sept. 23: Motion for Reconsideration of Rule 12 Order |
Sept. 22: Motion for Continuance (PDF)
Note: The Court has ordered a hearing on this motion for Oct. 2 |
Sept. 21: Official court transcript of the Sept. 16 hearing (58-page PDF) |
Sept. 17: Official court transcript of the Sept. 9 Hearing (83-page PDF) |
Sept. 16: Court decides on Rule 12 motion
and Answers to Questions of the Court |
Sept. 9: Concerning today’s hearing in the 141st District Court |
Aug. 27: Bishop Iker calls for prayer and fasting during the week of Sept. 6 |
May 8: The Diocese files a Motion to Dismiss the lawsuit filed by a rival diocese |
The President of the Standing Committee writes a letter concerning the April 14 lawsuit |
April 23: Lawsuit papers reach Bishop Iker |
April 15: Bishop Iker responds to news reports of a lawsuit |
|
|
|
|
|
s